B-1 accelerates for take off (background), during Operation Enduring Freedom. United States Air Force photograph by: SrA Rebeca M. Luquin.

Diego Garcia, situated midway between India and Africa, has been a British territory – leased to the United States.

On the Chagos archipelago, you can find the background to this case in this article I wrote for the New Statesman.

It was from Diego Garcia that bombing raids were conducted in Iraq and it is still used for the Afghan campaign.

The Chagossians suffered a setback in the Supreme Court – although their case established an important precedent concerning the use of leaked diplomatic cables in court.


Exiled Chagos islanders suffer Supreme Court defeat in battle to return home

Source: Press Association

The UK’s highest court rejected an appeal following a hearing in London last year.

Last updated:08 February 2018 – 01.01pm

Chagos islanders forcibly removed from their home in the Indian Ocean decades ago have suffered defeat in the latest round of their long legal battle over their exile.

The UK’s highest court dismissed an appeal on Thursday following a hearing in London last year.

Former inhabitants removed by the UK Government to make way for a US Air Force base sought a ruling that a decision to create a marine park around the British-controlled islands was for the improper purpose of preventing their future resettlement.

Olivier Bancoult who has suffered defeat at the Supreme Court over the Chagos islands (Jonathan Brady/PA)
Olivier Bancoult who has suffered defeat at the Supreme Court over the Chagos islands (Jonathan Brady/PA)

Families were forced to leave the islands in the 1960s and 1970s to make way for the US base on the largest island, Diego Garcia. The last residents of the British colony were removed in May 1973.

Olivier Bancoult, the Chagossians’ leader, has been fighting in the courts on behalf of the islanders for decades.

In the latest challenge at the Supreme Court, he wanted to overturn a Court of Appeal ruling that there was no improper motive behind the marine park, which includes a ban on fishing – a crucial issue if the islands are to be resettled.

But five out of seven justices dismissed Mr Bancoult’s appeal in relation to the “improper ulterior motive” aspect of his challenge.

The panel of judges unanimously rejected a second limb of his case against the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary in which he argued that the consultation which preceded the decision to establish the marine park was “flawed”.

Nigel Pleming QC, for Mr Bancoult, chairman of the Chagos Refugees Group, told the Supreme Court last June that the islanders “are not opposed at all to the environmental protection for their homeland”.

But they were “strongly against” the no-fishing element of the 250,000 square mile marine protected area (MPA).

The move brought to an end all commercial fishing including that carried out by Chagossians as owners and crew of Mauritian-registered fishing boats.

At the centre of the latest challenge was a classified US Government cable published by WikiLeaks, which the islanders said supported their case on “improper motive”.

But the majority of the Supreme Court justices ruled that the exclusion of the cable in evidence during earlier court proceedings “could have had no material effect on the outcome regarding improper motive”.

One of the justices, Lord Mance, said in a lengthy written ruling that the “sad history” had been told on a number of occasions, and the circumstances of the removal and resettlement of the islanders “has generated much national and now also international litigation”.

The judge pointed out that on November 16 2016 the UK Government announced its decision to maintain the ban on resettlement.

“That decision is itself the subject of further judicial review proceedings, ” he said.