His Royal Highness King Okpabi, Paramount Ruler of the Ogale Community commented on the appeal:

“The Ogale Community is praying for success in the Supreme Court. We have always been adamant that the only hope for the people of Ogale to get justice for decades of pollution visited upon us by the acts of Royal Dutch Shell is through the Courts of the United Kingdom.

Source: Leigh Day

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, 15 June, 2020 

Supreme Court to hear Nigerian communities’ pollution claims against Shell 

bille-nigeria-oil-spill-1

More than 40,000 Nigerians from the Ogale and Bille Communities in the Niger Delta will take their legal fight against Shell to the UK Supreme Court on Tuesday, 23 June 2020.

The case will be heard via video link and will be live-streamed online. The hearing is listed for one day.

The communities argue in their legal case that they have been severely affected by years of oil spills from oil pipelines owned and operated by Shell.  Oil spills and pollution from Shell’s operations and their devastating effect on Niger Delta citizens over many decades have been widely documented, including by the United Nations Environmental Programme in 2011, which recommended an urgent clean-up.  However, no clean-up has taken place.

The communities have taken their case to the English courts on the basis that Royal Dutch Shell (RDS), which is headquartered in London, is legally responsible for the environmental failures of the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC), a subsidiary of RDS.

The court proceedings to date have focused on the question of whether RDS can be sued in the English courts for damage caused by its Nigerian subsidiary.  The Supreme Court clarified the law in this area in April, 2019 in the case in which Vedanta Resources Plc was held to be arguably liable for the acts of its Zambian subsidiary, the Konkola Copper Mine. Lord Briggs in the Vedanta case held that a parent company can be held to account for the commitments it makes publicly, regarding their subsidiaries and their commitments to the communities they serve.

In granting permission for the Nigerian communities to appeal the ruling that they could not bring their claim in the English courts, the Supreme Court stated that “the law has been adequately clarified in Vedanta, but […] it would be unjust to refuse permission in circumstances where this case might equally have been treated as the lead case”.

The communities’ case was originally heard in the High Court in November, 2016. The High Court ruled in January, 2017 that RDS was not responsible for the harm because it is merely a holding company which did not exercise any control over SPDC. That decision was appealed and, while the judges agreed that the High Court judgment was flawed, the Court of Appeal held by majority in February, 2018 that there was insufficient evidence of “operational control” by RDS to hold it liable.

The claimants contend that the Court of Appeal made significant errors of law, including in finding that the existence of group-wide environmental policies issued by a parent company could never be capable of founding a duty of care. That finding is contradicted by the judgment in the Vedanta case.  Additionally, and as a result of those errors of law, the Court of Appeal failed to properly assess evidence which was capable of evidencing a duty of care, and which far outweighed the evidence before the Supreme Court in the Vedanta case.

The Supreme Court has also granted permission for two written interventions by Corner House Research, and the International Commission of Jurists and CORE Coalition.

His Royal Highness King Okpabi, Paramount Ruler of the Ogale Community commented on the appeal:

“The Ogale Community is praying for success in the Supreme Court. We have always been adamant that the only hope for the people of Ogale to get justice for decades of pollution visited upon us by the acts of Royal Dutch Shell is through the Courts of the United Kingdom.  

“We look forward to the Supreme Court hearing and we trust that the Supreme Court will do justice, even if we cannot be there in person to witness the proceedings because of the coronavirus pandemic.”

Daniel Leader, solicitor at law firm Leigh Day, added:

“We look forward to presenting our clients’ case to the Supreme Court.  The ruling in the Vedanta case clarified the law in this area and we hope the Supreme Court will agree that our clients should be able to hold Royal Dutch Shell to account in the English courts for the devastating damage Shell has caused to their communities over many years.”

ENDS 

Note to editors 

Leigh day also represented the claimants in the Vedanta case. That case is being brought by almost 2,000 Zambian villagers against Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) and its parent company Vedanta Resources Plc.

KCM is a Zambian company which is a subsidiary of UK-based Vedanta. The claimants allege that as a result of the toxic effluent discharge from the Nchanga Copper Mine which is run by KCM they have suffered loss of livelihood through damage to the land and waterways and health problems through having to consume and use polluted water.

Now that jurisdiction has been determined their claims will be heard in the High Court at a date to be determined.

More information can be found here: https://www.leighday.co.uk/News/2019/April-2019/Supreme-Court-rules-Zambian-villagers-case-against

 

His Royal Highness King Okpabi and Leigh Day Partner, Daniel Leader will be available for interview ahead of the hearing next week.

Please contact the Leigh Day press office on pressoffice@leighday.co.uk if you would like to arrange that.

 

A further background note is attached to this email.

 

Maxine Wolstenholme, Media Relations Manager

Leigh Day Building C (Man 35), Central Park, Northampton Road, Manchester M40 5BP

Tel: 07775 713725 Fax: 020 7253 4433 DX 53326 Clerkenwell

*Covid-19: Following government advice Leigh Day employees are working from home in a secure manner and the firm remains available to all for legal services. We have arrangements in place to deal with post received and sent but we would suggest email as a preferred method of communication at this time. More details are in the firm’s privacy policy in this email footer and on our website.

We are committed to protecting your privacy when you use our services and treat all personal data in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from mwolstenholme@leighday.co.uk sent at 2020-06-15 09:01:53 is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for use by those authorised to receive it. If you are not so authorised, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in reliance upon the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. We do not accept service of documents by email.

Please be aware of the increase in cybercrime and fraud. If you receive an email purporting to be from someone at Leigh Day that is unexpected or unusual please do not reply to the email nor act on any information contained in it but contact us immediately via the number on the firm’s website or headed notepaper. In particular, please note that we only provide our bank account details in a password protected PDF. The password will be communicated separately by telephone. We will never send changes to our bank account details by email outside of this process.

Visit the Leigh Day website: https://www.leighday.co.uk
Leigh Day is a partnership authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). The firm’s SRA number is 00067679.

PLEASE THINK ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL